What's this? I mean, I don't understand what's the basis of such a movement, if this news is true. Is there any mandate that an actor has to guarantee heavy profits for his films to the theater owners before release? Or is it that films of all other actors in the last 5 yrs have fetched them sky rocketing profits? Gimme a break!
 

I am a VIJAY fanTM

MADAN.




From: kalaimy87 <kalaimy87@yahoo.com>
To: OnlyVijayFans@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 21 May, 2010 4:20:45 PM
Subject: [OnlyVijayFans] Up in arms against Vijay

 

Up in arms against Vijay
IndiaGlitz [Friday, May 21, 2010]

Vijay's recent not so impressive record at the box office has upset many and particularly the exhibitors who are last link in the chain of film making. Theatre owners in Tamil Nadu have called for an emergency meeting to discuss the status of screening Vijay films in future.
 
Theatre owners in Tamil Nadu charge that in the last five years Vijay has done seven films and they have suffered huge losses as they all failed to click. Out of Aadhi, Pokkiri, Azhagiya Thamizh Magan, Kuruvi, Villu, Vettaikkaran and Sura released in the last few years they say only `Pokkiri' fetched them profits.


http://www.indiagli tz.com/channels/ tamil/article/ 57153.html


 
To compensate the losses they incurred by screening the above films the theatre owners are asking Vijay to do a film exclusively for the theatre owners. If not they will issue a red card to the actor and will not screen Vijay films in future.
 
To discuss the issue further theatre owners are holding an emergency meeting tomorrow May 22. This sudden development is closely watched by the industry


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Get real-time World Cup coverage on the Yahoo! Toolbar. Download now to win a signed team jersey!

.

__,_._,___

0 comments: